Guy Kawasaki’s Top Sixteen Lies of Lawyers
Here is a humorous post I found in Guy Kawasaki’s blog, all you technology lawyers out there can decide whether it is true or not. You can read it for yourself at www.guykawasaki.com. Enjoy.
1. “I’m really excited about what you are doing and will give your company my personal attention.” Once someone gets to the partner level, making it “rain” is as important as doing “work.” This is part of a standard sales pitch, so don’t let it go to your head.
2. “Our firm is really excited about what you’re doing, so we’d like to invest in your company too.” Also part of the standard sales pitch. Most firms invest in most of their startup clients—it’s simply the law of big numbers: Invest in enough dumb ideas, and one will turn out to be a Google.
3.“We can work on the billing so that you pay us when you get financed.” The final flattery in a good sales pitch. As with the others, don’t think you’re special. This is a common offer.
4. “I’ll have that to you by the end of the day.” The important question for you to ask when you hear this is, “End of exactly which day?” Because every day has an end. And you should find out how your lawyer defines the end of the day: 6:00 pm or 11:59 pm (thanks, zakstar).
5. “Don’t worry about the date on that option grant; it’s not a big deal.” Unless you enjoy getting indicted, you should run from a lawyer who utters such stupidity.
6. “The bill would be lower if it weren’t for the lawyers on the other side.” You do realize that the lawyers on the other side are saying this about your lawyers too, right?
7. “I thought you were more interested in getting it right rather than saving a few dollars.” In other words, the legal bill for your series A funding may exceed the amount of capital raised.
8. “Your case is much stronger than theirs; I’m sure we can convince them.” If your position is so strong, you don’t need lawyers. It’s when your position is weak that you need them. Also, your opponent is hearing the same thing about their case.
9. “We have relationships at the highest level in Shanghai/Munich/Mumbai/New York/LA.” In other words, someone from the firm once flew in first class to Shanghai/Munich/Mumbai/New York/LA with the vice premier’s uncle’s sister’s nephew.
10. “We’d much rather be on the company side than on the investor side.” Let me get this straight: Your lawyer would rather be on the side of two guys/gals in garage who are raising $500,000 than a venture capital fund managing $500 million whose partners play golf at the same country club?
11. “We usually don’t bill the full retainer; it only happens if there are unforeseen issues that come up.” One of two things is happening: either you’ve been sandbagged with an artificially high estimate or your lawyer just passed the bar.
12. “Sure we’re busy, but I’ll make sure you don’t get handed off to a green associate.” Translation: Your main contact passed the bar a year ago.
13. “I’ve done work with Google/Microsoft/Apple, so I know how to structure deals with them.” Translation: “My favorite search engine is Google which I use on my Windows laptop while I’m listening to my iPod.”
14. “We think you will have a very strong patent.” If you hear this, ask this question: “So if Microsoft infringes on it, we’d win?”
15. “We know the opposing attorneys, so we’ll be able to work out something quickly and cheaply.” This is like asking the hotel concierge what restaurant he recommends. There is usually no such thing as quickly and cheaply. There’s only “good and expensive,” “quick and lousy,” and “cheap and lousy.” Pick one.
16. “I can call several venture capitalists to help you secure funding.” Actually, you should select your lawyer as much for his/her connections to the venture capital community as much as legal expertise. However, take this very literally: He/she “can” call—this is different from “will” call.
No comments yet.
Leave a comment
-
Archives
- May 2009 (1)
- March 2009 (2)
- February 2009 (5)
- December 2008 (3)
- October 2008 (1)
- August 2008 (7)
- July 2008 (4)
- June 2008 (6)
- May 2008 (8)
- April 2008 (8)
- March 2008 (1)
- February 2008 (11)
-
Categories
- ABA Bar Journal
- Airport security
- America COMPETES Act
- Antipiracy technology
- Antitrust
- Apple
- AT&T
- Billionaires in India
- Blogs
- blogTV
- Botnets
- Business
- Canadian Copyright
- Children
- China
- clandestine movie taping
- Cloned food
- Communication Decency Act
- compulsory vaccinations
- Computer hacking
- Contract
- Cops inside the Internet
- Copyright
- Copyright and innovation
- Copyright Infringement
- Courage and Love
- Cyber safety
- cybercrime
- cyberethics
- cyberlaw
- Cybersafety
- cybersecurity
- Cybersquatting
- Cyberwar
- Defamation
- Digital technology
- DMCA
- domain info
- Domain name registration
- DoubleClick
- email in Hindi
- Emerging India
- EU
- Executive Privilege
- Faith
- FDA
- FISA
- Forbe's list
- Fraud
- Free Speech
- freedom
- FTC
- Global privacy
- Google and trademarks
- Google's Gphone
- Googleplex
- GPay
- Gphone
- HIPAA
- Identity theft
- Immigration
- India
- India Innovative Act
- Indian Business Women
- Indian IT sector
- Industries
- Intellectual property enforcement
- Internet
- Inventions
- IP infringement
- iPhone
- iPod Touch
- Labeling
- Lanham Act.
- liberty
- Licensing
- Live streaming video
- Marketing
- Medical records
- Microsoft
- Monks
- Monopoly
- Music Sharing
- Networking Sites
- New age
- On-line world
- online fraud
- p2p
- parents liability
- passwords
- patent law
- Patent Reform
- PBS Wired Science
- Perjury
- Personal information
- Phishing
- photographing a witness
- Piracy
- privacy
- Razr2
- Research
- RFID chips
- RIAA
- Security
- site linking
- Social networking
- spam
- Spam. Identity theft
- Splogs and Blawgs
- Statutory Rape
- Steve Jobs
- Surveillance
- surveillance technology
- Targeted advertising
- Technology
- Technology and law
- Technology industry
- Trademark
- Treo
- Uncategorized
- Unethical conduct
- Victim identification
- Virtual Friends
- VMWare
- Wiretapping
- Witness intimidation
- Yahoo
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS