Internet Sites and Statutory Rape
In Doe v SexSearch.com an Ohio case, the plaintiff a male was charged with felony statutory rape. The facts are that a minor posing to be a 18 year old in her profile on SexSearch.com’s website met the plaintiff online and later both met in person and had consensual sex. The plaintiff was then charged with statutory rape, for having sex with a 14 year old. Plaintiff sued SexSearch.com alleging that (1) Defendants failed to discuss that the minor (Jane Roe) lied about her age to join the website and (2) the terms of the contract to join the website were unconscionable.
The Judge held against the plaintiff on both the claims stating that the “plaintiff was not an unsuspecting customer and “he was aware the SexSearch.com membership registration process did not include an age verification procedure. Plaintiff specifically agreed to the Terms and Conditions which stated that SexSearch does not guarantee or verify any information provided by the user of the website and nothing outside of the Terms and Conditions creates warranties.”
The Judge held that section 230 of the Communication Decency Act “Interactive Computer Services” cannot be held responsible for publishing information provided to them by a member.
When the plaintiff met the minor in person he probably should have taken steps to verify her age, even if she appeared to be 18 years old, but when desire takes over good sense there is no holding back. Now the sad part is that even though the sex was consensual the adult is being held responsible and the minor goes scot free, which is totally unfair but who said that law is fair…
-
Archives
- May 2009 (1)
- March 2009 (2)
- February 2009 (5)
- December 2008 (3)
- October 2008 (1)
- August 2008 (7)
- July 2008 (4)
- June 2008 (6)
- May 2008 (8)
- April 2008 (8)
- March 2008 (1)
- February 2008 (11)
-
Categories
- ABA Bar Journal
- Airport security
- America COMPETES Act
- Antipiracy technology
- Antitrust
- Apple
- AT&T
- Billionaires in India
- Blogs
- blogTV
- Botnets
- Business
- Canadian Copyright
- Children
- China
- clandestine movie taping
- Cloned food
- Communication Decency Act
- compulsory vaccinations
- Computer hacking
- Contract
- Cops inside the Internet
- Copyright
- Copyright and innovation
- Copyright Infringement
- Courage and Love
- Cyber safety
- cybercrime
- cyberethics
- cyberlaw
- Cybersafety
- cybersecurity
- Cybersquatting
- Cyberwar
- Defamation
- Digital technology
- DMCA
- domain info
- Domain name registration
- DoubleClick
- email in Hindi
- Emerging India
- EU
- Executive Privilege
- Faith
- FDA
- FISA
- Forbe's list
- Fraud
- Free Speech
- freedom
- FTC
- Global privacy
- Google and trademarks
- Google's Gphone
- Googleplex
- GPay
- Gphone
- HIPAA
- Identity theft
- Immigration
- India
- India Innovative Act
- Indian Business Women
- Indian IT sector
- Industries
- Intellectual property enforcement
- Internet
- Inventions
- IP infringement
- iPhone
- iPod Touch
- Labeling
- Lanham Act.
- liberty
- Licensing
- Live streaming video
- Marketing
- Medical records
- Microsoft
- Monks
- Monopoly
- Music Sharing
- Networking Sites
- New age
- On-line world
- online fraud
- p2p
- parents liability
- passwords
- patent law
- Patent Reform
- PBS Wired Science
- Perjury
- Personal information
- Phishing
- photographing a witness
- Piracy
- privacy
- Razr2
- Research
- RFID chips
- RIAA
- Security
- site linking
- Social networking
- spam
- Spam. Identity theft
- Splogs and Blawgs
- Statutory Rape
- Steve Jobs
- Surveillance
- surveillance technology
- Targeted advertising
- Technology
- Technology and law
- Technology industry
- Trademark
- Treo
- Uncategorized
- Unethical conduct
- Victim identification
- Virtual Friends
- VMWare
- Wiretapping
- Witness intimidation
- Yahoo
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS