Google continues to be sued under trademark law.
Geico sued Google under the trademark law stating that Google allowed competing insurers to buy the Geico mark as a keyword. American Blinds sued Google on similar issues that the sale of keyword based advertising violated the trademark law. Louis Vuitton filed a case against Google on similar claims and the French courts ruled that Google’s ad policies violated the French trademark law.
Now American Airlines has sued Google on the similar issue of search words involving its name. This lawsuit filed in the U.S. Court of the Northern District of Texas states that Google violates trademark laws by selling search terms such as “American Airlines” or “AA.com” to other companies for advertising. This is important because when Google sells the right to use a name or similar words, phrases or terms or trademarks that are confusingly similar to American Airlines to other competitors than when someone clicks on the phrase or term on Google’s ad then the competitor directs the search to the competitor’s own web pages.
In Geico the court held that there was no trademark infringement for use of keyword triggers and if a confusion occured in the consumers mind then all they had to do was click the Back button, but the court left issues of liablity open which was settled under confidentiality terms. So in essence it was a victory for Google.
The court in the American Blinds case upheld it’s right to go to trial on claims of trademark infringement, unfair competition and contributory dilution and the trial date is set in November and will be heard by Judge Fogel in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in San Jose. Now that is closer to home and it will be interesting to see what the Judge decides.
-
Archives
- May 2009 (1)
- March 2009 (2)
- February 2009 (5)
- December 2008 (3)
- October 2008 (1)
- August 2008 (7)
- July 2008 (4)
- June 2008 (6)
- May 2008 (8)
- April 2008 (8)
- March 2008 (1)
- February 2008 (11)
-
Categories
- ABA Bar Journal
- Airport security
- America COMPETES Act
- Antipiracy technology
- Antitrust
- Apple
- AT&T
- Billionaires in India
- Blogs
- blogTV
- Botnets
- Business
- Canadian Copyright
- Children
- China
- clandestine movie taping
- Cloned food
- Communication Decency Act
- compulsory vaccinations
- Computer hacking
- Contract
- Cops inside the Internet
- Copyright
- Copyright and innovation
- Copyright Infringement
- Courage and Love
- Cyber safety
- cybercrime
- cyberethics
- cyberlaw
- Cybersafety
- cybersecurity
- Cybersquatting
- Cyberwar
- Defamation
- Digital technology
- DMCA
- domain info
- Domain name registration
- DoubleClick
- email in Hindi
- Emerging India
- EU
- Executive Privilege
- Faith
- FDA
- FISA
- Forbe's list
- Fraud
- Free Speech
- freedom
- FTC
- Global privacy
- Google and trademarks
- Google's Gphone
- Googleplex
- GPay
- Gphone
- HIPAA
- Identity theft
- Immigration
- India
- India Innovative Act
- Indian Business Women
- Indian IT sector
- Industries
- Intellectual property enforcement
- Internet
- Inventions
- IP infringement
- iPhone
- iPod Touch
- Labeling
- Lanham Act.
- liberty
- Licensing
- Live streaming video
- Marketing
- Medical records
- Microsoft
- Monks
- Monopoly
- Music Sharing
- Networking Sites
- New age
- On-line world
- online fraud
- p2p
- parents liability
- passwords
- patent law
- Patent Reform
- PBS Wired Science
- Perjury
- Personal information
- Phishing
- photographing a witness
- Piracy
- privacy
- Razr2
- Research
- RFID chips
- RIAA
- Security
- site linking
- Social networking
- spam
- Spam. Identity theft
- Splogs and Blawgs
- Statutory Rape
- Steve Jobs
- Surveillance
- surveillance technology
- Targeted advertising
- Technology
- Technology and law
- Technology industry
- Trademark
- Treo
- Uncategorized
- Unethical conduct
- Victim identification
- Virtual Friends
- VMWare
- Wiretapping
- Witness intimidation
- Yahoo
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS