The Patent Reform Act of 2007 (H.R.1908)
The U.S. House of Representatives approved and passed a major patent reforms legislation by a vote of 220 to 175, but it still has to be approved by the Senate. It was a big hit with the technology industry. It is authored by Rep. Howard Berman, D-Calif., and the summary of the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (H.R.1908) is stated at Washington Watch.com as follows:
“Patent Reform Act of 2007 – Modifies conditions under which a patent may be obtained for an invention or discovery, including by: (1) defining “inventor” to include a joint inventor and co-inventor; (2) making the effective filing date of a claimed invention the filing date of the patent or the patent application; and (3) revising procedures for patent interference disputes.
Revises requirements for an inventor’s oath or declaration to allow substitute statements in specified circumstances (e.g., death or disability) and supplemental and corrected statements.
Allows a third party assignee (other than the inventor) or a person with a proprietary interest to file a patent application.
Modifies provisions relating to damages for patent infringement to: (1) require a court to conduct an analysis of a patent’s specific contribution over prior art; (2) allow increased damages for willfull patent infringement; and (3) expand the prior user defense.
Renames the Board of Patent Appeals as the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Revises provisions relating to the Board’s composition, duties, and authorities.
Allows a person who is not the patent owner to file a petition with the Board to cancel a patent as invalid (post-grant review). Sets forth procedures for the consideration of such petitions, including provisions to prevent harassment of patent owners and abuse of process.
Allows third parties to submit documents relevant to the examination of a patent application.
Revises venue requirements for civil patent actions against individuals and corporations to allow actions to be brought in the judicial district where either party resides (currently, where the defendant resides) or where the corporation has its principal place of business or was incorporated.”
The main features of the above is that the Act will be more aligned to international patent standards, till date in the US patents were granted to the first inventor to invent the technology but now the patent will be granted to the first inventor to file an application. The bill limits infringement damages awarded to the actual value of the product infringed instead of the overall value of the completed product and it allows the Patent and Trade Mark Office to establish new patent related rules.
Since the legislation approves the publication of patent applications before they are actually issued, opponents to the bill have labeled it the ‘Steal America Technologies Bill’ and stated that the bill will enable foreign countries to steal US technologies.
-
Archives
- May 2009 (1)
- March 2009 (2)
- February 2009 (5)
- December 2008 (3)
- October 2008 (1)
- August 2008 (7)
- July 2008 (4)
- June 2008 (6)
- May 2008 (8)
- April 2008 (8)
- March 2008 (1)
- February 2008 (11)
-
Categories
- ABA Bar Journal
- Airport security
- America COMPETES Act
- Antipiracy technology
- Antitrust
- Apple
- AT&T
- Billionaires in India
- Blogs
- blogTV
- Botnets
- Business
- Canadian Copyright
- Children
- China
- clandestine movie taping
- Cloned food
- Communication Decency Act
- compulsory vaccinations
- Computer hacking
- Contract
- Cops inside the Internet
- Copyright
- Copyright and innovation
- Copyright Infringement
- Courage and Love
- Cyber safety
- cybercrime
- cyberethics
- cyberlaw
- Cybersafety
- cybersecurity
- Cybersquatting
- Cyberwar
- Defamation
- Digital technology
- DMCA
- domain info
- Domain name registration
- DoubleClick
- email in Hindi
- Emerging India
- EU
- Executive Privilege
- Faith
- FDA
- FISA
- Forbe's list
- Fraud
- Free Speech
- freedom
- FTC
- Global privacy
- Google and trademarks
- Google's Gphone
- Googleplex
- GPay
- Gphone
- HIPAA
- Identity theft
- Immigration
- India
- India Innovative Act
- Indian Business Women
- Indian IT sector
- Industries
- Intellectual property enforcement
- Internet
- Inventions
- IP infringement
- iPhone
- iPod Touch
- Labeling
- Lanham Act.
- liberty
- Licensing
- Live streaming video
- Marketing
- Medical records
- Microsoft
- Monks
- Monopoly
- Music Sharing
- Networking Sites
- New age
- On-line world
- online fraud
- p2p
- parents liability
- passwords
- patent law
- Patent Reform
- PBS Wired Science
- Perjury
- Personal information
- Phishing
- photographing a witness
- Piracy
- privacy
- Razr2
- Research
- RFID chips
- RIAA
- Security
- site linking
- Social networking
- spam
- Spam. Identity theft
- Splogs and Blawgs
- Statutory Rape
- Steve Jobs
- Surveillance
- surveillance technology
- Targeted advertising
- Technology
- Technology and law
- Technology industry
- Trademark
- Treo
- Uncategorized
- Unethical conduct
- Victim identification
- Virtual Friends
- VMWare
- Wiretapping
- Witness intimidation
- Yahoo
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS